There are three ways reciprocal links result by biggest Seach Engine,
Google's result page:
Google's result page:
- Low authority, non reciprocating site
- Low authority, non reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Test page linking to #9 below
- Test page linking to #2 above
- Low authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site (keyword in link)
Google supplemental results show the remainder of the testing pages. Missing from SERPs: High authority, non-reciprocating site.
Yahoo's result page:
- Low authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site
- High authority, reciprocating site
- Test page linking to #8 below
- Test page linking to #2 above
- Low authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, non-reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Link to a blog post that uses keyword as part of the URL
Missing from SERPs: Low authority, reciprocating site, High authority, non-reciprocating site (keyword in link)
MSN's Result page:
- High authority, reciprocating site
- Test page linking to #10 below
- Test page linking to #1 above
- Low authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, non reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, non reciprocating site
- High authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, non-reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site
- Low authority, reciprocating site
We can conclude from that that, all things being equal, reciprocating links have no more or less value than one-way links.
Yeah, I know, we all read Matt Cutt's post about how excessive reciprocal linking can hurt, and I'm sure Matt is right. But the key word there is "excessive".
No comments:
Post a Comment